Legal Opinion

City of Statham v. Diversified Development Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 18, 2001No. A01A0729PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Chief Judge.

The City of Statham (the City) brought the underlying action against Diversified Development Company seeking an injunction which would require that Diversified remove four billboards which were erected in violation of city ordinances. The parties filed competing motions for summary judgment, and the trial court granted Diversified’s motion. The City appeals. “We review a trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, and we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmovant. On de novo review, we ‘owe no deference to the trial court’s conclusions of law.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Corey Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Board of Zoning AdjustmentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  2. Reidling v. HolcombCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Fierer v. AsheCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Leeds Building Products, Inc. v. Sears Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  5. Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Clayton County Board of Tax AssessorsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crown Media, LLC v. Gwinnett County, GACourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Anthony v. GATOR COCHRAN CONSTRUCTION, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  3. Alpha Rho Corporation of Delta Delta Delta v. Mathis Apartments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API