Legal Opinion

Golden Peanut Co. v. Bass

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 30, 2001No. A00A2362PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mikell, Judge.

Golden Peanut Company (“Golden Peanut”) appeals a judgment in favor of Neon Earl Bass, Jr., Dry Branch Farms, Inc., and VarnerBass Enterprises (“plaintiffs”) on a breach of contract claim. Following a two-week trial, the jury returned a large verdict in favor of the plaintiffs. The trial court denied Golden Peanut’s motions for directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and this appeal followed. Because the trial court committed harmful error in refusing to give Golden Peanut’s requested jury charge on accord and satisfaction, we reverse.

This case involves…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Georgia Power Co. v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  3. Continental Casualty Co. v. Union Camp Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  4. Christiansen v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  5. Riley & Co. v. London Guaranty & Accident Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Renton v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  2. Smith v. StaceySupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  3. Horton v. HendrixCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  4. Lawyers Title Insurance v. New Freedom Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  5. Turnage v. KasperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API