Legal Opinion

Betallic, Inc. v. Deavours

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 24, 1994No. S93G0910PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sears-Collins, Justice.

We agree with the Court of Appeals’ conclusion in this case and with that court’s construction of OCGA § 9-15-14, except that part where the court finds that a claim for litigation costs and attorney *797fees assessed for frivolous actions and defenses is available only to a “prevailing party.” Deavours v. Hog Mtn. Creations, 207 Ga. App. 557 (428 SE2d 388) (1993). OCGA § 9-15-14 does not limit recovery to a certain party, but permits any party to recover from another party who has “unnecessarily expanded the proceeding by . . . improper conduct, including, but not limited…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. FAIRBURN BANKING COMPANY v. GaffordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. Brewer v. PaulkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  3. McCullough v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  4. Hamil v. StanfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  5. Reese v. GrantSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API