Legal Opinion

Capitol Supply Co. v. City of St. Paul

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 5, 1982No. 81-202PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

Capitol Supply Co. (Capitol), plaintiff, appeals from a judgment on the pleadings in favor of the City of St. Paul (City), defendant, on the ground that Capitol’s cause of action was barred by the statute of limitations. We reverse.

It is a well-settled rule of law that in reviewing the trial court’s order granting the defendant judgment on the pleadings, this court is limited to the facts asserted in the pleadings interpreted in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Stephenson v. Plastics Corp. of America, 276 Minn. 400, 150 N.W.2d 668 (1967).

The pertinent facts viewed in the light most…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bonhiver v. GraffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  3. Kittson County v. Wells, Denbrook & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Continental Grain Company v. Fegles Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  5. Stephenson v. Plastics Corporation of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Sartori v. Harnischfeger Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Siewert v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  3. Nolan and Nolan v. City of EaganCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  4. Ritter v. Abbey-Etna MacHine Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  5. Griebel v. Andersen Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API