State v. Rickmier
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was indicted by the grand jury of Waseca county, charged with the crime of grand larceny in the second degree, tried in the district court for that county before Childress, J., who at the close of the testimony denied defendant’s motion for a directed verdict and a jury which found him guilty as charged in the indictment. From the order denying his motion for a new trial and from the judgment of conviction, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
The defendant was convicted of grand larceny in the second degree upon an indictment charging him with the stealing of two pigs of the value of $40, the property of one Deverell, and he appeals.
1. At the foot of the indictment were the names of five witnesses sworn and examined before the grand jury. The defendant moved to set aside the indictment and made a showing that his sister was examined as a witness before the grand jury. Her name was not upon the indictment. The court denied the motion and this ruling is assigned as error. The two sections of G. S. 1913 relevant upon this contention…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Langdon v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- State v. LapointSupreme Court of Vermont · 1913
- People v. HoldenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gransbury v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938
- State v. Waddell.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932