Legal Opinion

Gransbury v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided July 22, 1938No. A-9509PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarefoot, J.

The defendant was charged with the crime of burglary in Grant county, was tried, convicted of burglary in the second degree, and sentenced to serve a term of four years in the penitentiary, and has appealed.

Defendant’s first assignment of error is that the verdict of the jury is contrary to law and the evidence, and the court erred in overruling his demurrer to the evidence offered by the state.

This contention is based principally upon the fact that the evidence relied upon by the state is partially circumstantial, and there was no direct evidence that the defendant was present, or entered…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Star v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Inklebarger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Ex Parte JefferiesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Penrod v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. LoukWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. EastmondUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Highfill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  5. McLeroy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API