Legal Opinion

People v. Holden

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 29, 1910No. Crim. No. 122PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Placer County, and from an order denying a new trial. N. D. Arnot, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

Defendant and one Edward Hansen were jointly charged with the crime of an assault with intent to commit robbery upon one John Connolly on September 28, 1909. A demurrer to the information was overruled and defendant Holden was tried separately and found guilty as charged. A motion for a new trial was denied and defendant was sentenced to imprisonment in San Quentin for three years. He appeals from the judgment of conviction and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The information charges the crime of felony as follows: “Assault with intent to commit robbery, committed as follows:…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. PeralesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. People v. MahonyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Goss v. Steiger Terra Cotta & Pottery WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. People v. ShearerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. People v. WeirCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. HatchettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. People v. LaparaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. People v. SimeoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. People v. AlexanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. People v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API