Legal Opinion
Mazer v. Security Insurance Group
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 13, 1973No. Civ. A. 69-1353PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ADJUDICATION
DITTER, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought a malpractice action against a doctor who was insured by the defendants. A verdict greater than the policy limits having been recovered, the doctor assigned to plaintiff whatever claim he might have as a result of alleged negligence on the part of his insurers in failing to join a third-party defendant.
After a trial without a jury, I make the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Plaintiff was a citizen of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts at the time suit was instituted.
2. Defendant, Security Insurance Group, [hereinafter “Security”] is a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Davis v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Reardon v. MeehanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Mazer v. LipshutzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Jacob Norton v. Railway Express Agency, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Weisman v. Sauder Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gans, Curtis, G. v. Mundy, James F. And the Law Firm of Raynes, McCarty Binder & MundyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Lentino v. Fringe Employee Plans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Mills v. CooterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Molever v. RoushCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Composition Roofers Local 30/30B v. KatzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.