Legal Opinion

Composition Roofers Local 30/30B v. Katz

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 1990No. 3121PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order which sustained the preliminary objections of appellees and dismissed the action filed by the Composition Roofers Local 30/30B, (hereinafter referred to as “Union”). For the reasons outlined below, we affirm.

The underlying facts are as follows. The Union retained Bernard Katz, Esquire, and the law firm of Meranze & Katz, (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Katz”), to advise it on all legal matters. In October of 1986, thirteen of the Union’s former officers and agents were indicted in the United States District Court for the Eastern…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers v. Illinois State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Guy v. LiederbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Highway Truck Drivers and Helpers Local 107 v. CohenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Roach v. Port Auth. of Allegheny Cty.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. McPeake v. Cannon, Esquire, PCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Werner v. Plater-ZyberkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Pawlowski v. SmortoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Clark v. BeardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Ammon v. McCloskeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Fiorentino v. RapoportSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API