Karpinski v. Smitty's Bar, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLINE, P. J. —
Appellant Smitty’s Bar, Inc. (Smitty’s), appeals after the trial court granted the motion of respondent Keith Karpinski to enforce a settlement between the parties, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6. 1 On appeal, Smitty’s contends the trial court erred when it granted the motion because satisfaction of two outstanding statutory medical liens — involving the California Victims of Crime Program and Medicare 2 — is a condition precedent to payment of the settlement proceeds, and Karpinski has failed to satisfy the liens. We shall affirm the judgment.
FACTUAL…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Weddington Productions, Inc. v. FlickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Wolf v. Walt Disney Pictures and TelevisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- FPI Development, Inc. v. NakashimaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Sea & Sage Audubon Society, Inc. v. Planning CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Johnson v. GreenelshCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lofton v. Wells Fargo Home Mortg., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Harper v. Charter Communications, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021