Legal Opinion

Karpinski v. Smitty's Bar, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 12, 2016No. A143381PublishedCited by 2 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLINE, P. J. —

Appellant Smitty’s Bar, Inc. (Smitty’s), appeals after the trial court granted the motion of respondent Keith Karpinski to enforce a settlement between the parties, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6. 1 On appeal, Smitty’s contends the trial court erred when it granted the motion because satisfaction of two outstanding statutory medical liens — involving the California Victims of Crime Program and Medicare 2 — is a condition precedent to payment of the settlement proceeds, and Karpinski has failed to satisfy the liens. We shall affirm the judgment.

FACTUAL…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Weddington Productions, Inc. v. FlickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Wolf v. Walt Disney Pictures and TelevisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. FPI Development, Inc. v. NakashimaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Sea & Sage Audubon Society, Inc. v. Planning CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Johnson v. GreenelshCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lofton v. Wells Fargo Home Mortg., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Harper v. Charter Communications, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API