Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Greenelsh

California Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 2009No. S166747PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CORRIGAN, J.

Here we conclude that a challenge to a surviving spouse’s mental capacity to transfer trust assets and appoint a successor trustee did not violate the no contest clause in a family trust. A proceeding contesting a settlor’s mental competence to exercise rights under a trust does not amount to an attack on the trust itself, unless it seeks to thwart the estate plan established by the trust.

BACKGROUND

Spouses Walter and Florence Warren created the Warren Family Trust in 1993. Walter, Florence, and their children William Warren and Kathryn A. Greenelsh (Greenelsh) were named…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cable Connection, Inc. v. DirecTV, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Burch v. GeorgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Bambridge v. WestermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Scharlin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Grunauer v. FriedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Gutierrez v. Carmax Auto Superstores Cal., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Esparza v. KS Indus., L.P., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. Tribeca Companies, LLC v. First American Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Donkin v. DonkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Frakes v. NayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API