Legal Opinion

Eliot Five Cents Savings Bank v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 30, 1886PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Morton, G. J.

By the policy in suit, the defendant insured “ George B. Taylor, payable in case of loss to Eliot Five Cents Savings Bank, mortgagees, as interest may appear,” on a building in Boston called the Hotel Clifton, in the sum of $5000, for five years from July 1,1881. The policy is in the standard form prescribed by the Pub. Sts. o. 119, § 139, and the St. of 1881, c. 166, § 1, and contains the provision that, “if this policy shall be made payable to a mortgagee of the insured real estate, no act or default of any person other than such mortgagee, or his agents or those claiming under…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Palmer Savings Bank v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  2. Union Institution for Savings v. Phoenix InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Continental Insurance v. BahnanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  4. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Empire Coal Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  5. Hardy v. Lancashire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API