Legal Opinion

Ham v. Hood

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 10, 1976PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant Charles W. Ham appeals from a $70,000 jury verdict and judgment awarded plaintiff Joyce Hood as a result of an automobile accident. All of the error which defendant insists constituted reversible error pertains to the trial judge's conduct of the trial. We reverse and remand because of the trial court's refusal to admit testimony that defendant's headlights were "burning after the accident."

Defendant's automobile collided with a pickup truck in which plaintiff was a passenger on Alabama Highway 157 in Lawrence County on October 15, 1974, at about 6:00 p.m. in rainy weather. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Maslankowski v. Beam Ex Rel. QuernemeonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  2. Sorrell v. ScheuerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. Chambers v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. Bradley v. DeatonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. Holuska v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hood v. HamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  2. Liberty National Life Ins. Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Liberty National Life Ins. Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API