Legal Opinion

Lehnen v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 27, 1998No. 79A04-9611-CV-465PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RATLIFF, Senior Judge.

Case Summary

In this eminent domain ease, Appellants-Defendants, John and Anita Lehnen (“Leh-nen”), appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion for relief from judgment, where judgment was entered following their failure to file exceptions to the appraiser’s report on damages.

Issues

Lehnen raises two issues for our review which we restate as:

I. Whether the trial court properly denied Lehnen’s motion for relief from judgment; and,

II. Whether the trial court’s denial of Lehnen’s motion effectively deprives them of property without due process of law.

Facts and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Swinney v. Ft. Wayne, Muncie & Cincinnati R. R.Indiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Slentz v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Cordill v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, DEPT., PARKS & REC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. State v. RousseauIndiana Supreme Court · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. MDM INVESTMENTS v. City of CarmelIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. State v. Universal Outdoor, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Lake Central School Corp. v. Hawk Development Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. New v. Personal Representative of the Estate of NewIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Merkor Management v. McCuanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API