Legal Opinion
Cordill v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, DEPT., PARKS & REC.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided April 14, 1976No. 2-673A128PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
The issue in this appeal is whether the trial court committed reversible error in sustaining a motion to strike the landowner-defendant’s exceptions to the report of appraisers1, which exceptions were filed in an eminent domain proceeding, more than ten days after the appraisers’ report was filed. The landowner (Cordill) contends that he was entitled to have a trial on his late-filed exceptions because the court clerk had failed to mail notice of the court’s order appointing appraisers to his attorney pursuant to Trial Rule 72(D) and Trial Rule 5, Indiana Rules of Procedure. Under the state…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Agan v. HENDRICKS SUP. CT., GIBBS, JUDGEIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. RousseauIndiana Supreme Court · 1936
- Ray v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
- Rees v. ReesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1961
- Auto Owners Ins. Co. v. BUCKEYE, ETC., CAS. CO.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1962
3Cited by14 opinions
- McGill v. Muddy Fork of Silver Creek Watershed Conservancy DistrictIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- MDM INVESTMENTS v. City of CarmelIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Lehnen v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Cynthia L. Seleme v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, as successor by merger to Chase Home FinanceIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Best Realty Corp. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.