Legal Opinion

Pichler v. Pacific Mechanical Constructors

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 15, 1969No. 12-39989-1PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Horowitz, A. C. J.

Plaintiff sued the corporate defendant, Pacific Mechanical Constructors (PAMCO) and its employee, Leslie B. Hartley, for personal injuries caused by negligence. Plaintiff recovered judgment in the case tried to the court. Defendants appeal raising four issues.

First. Defendants contend that plaintiff is PAMCO’s loaned servant in employment covered by the Industrial Insurance Act; that plaintiff is a fellow servant of Hartley whose claimed negligence caused the injury, and that under RCW 51.24.010 of the Industrial Insurance Act plaintiff is precluded from suing the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Nepstad v. LambertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  4. Hollingbery v. DunnWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Davis v. Early Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Weber v. Northern Illinois Gas Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  2. Kaufman v. KaufmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  3. Stocker v. SHELL OIL COMPANYWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. MarchantUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Joy Ward, Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem of Jacob R. Kinser v. Richard Gordon, M.D. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API