Legal Opinion

Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. Marchant

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1980No. 16512PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Chief Justice:

Plaintiff Western Casualty, which issued an automobile liability insurance policy to defendant Ralph Marchant, appeals from a finding that a clause excluding coverage of the insured’s own employees was not applicable to defendant Sherman Peterson who was injured while he was working on defendant Marchant’s demolition job site.

Plaintiff’s principal contention is that “the only reasonable conclusion from the evidence” is that Peterson was working as an employee of Marchant, and not of Gary Yates, as the trial court found. 1

Defendant Marchant operates a trucking business…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Peterick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  2. American States Ins. Co., Western Pac. Div. v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Antonini v. Hanna IndustriesNevada Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Harry L. Young & Sons, Inc. v. AshtonUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Stanford v. American Guaranty Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Kremers-Urban Co. v. American Employers Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. PitroloWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Western United Realty, Inc. v. IsaacsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  4. Proctor & Gamble Co. v. HaugenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  5. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. CallUtah Supreme Court · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API