Legal Opinion

Stocker v. SHELL OIL COMPANY

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1986No. 52133-6PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.

The issue in this case is whether the borrowed servant status of a negligent worker, assigned pursuant to a contract between a labor supplier and a labor user, may defeat an express indemnity agreement between the contracting parties. We hold that borrowed servant status may not defeat a valid contractual indemnification agreement, and in so holding we reverse the judgment and remand.

The two parties to this appeal are Shell Oil Co. (Shell) and P. M. Northwest, Inc. (P.M.). P.M., a Washington corporation, is a labor contractor providing workers to the various oil refineries and chemical plants…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Glass v. Stahl Specialty CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Jones v. Strom Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Davis v. Early Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Redford v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Brown v. Prime Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Morgan v. ABC MANUFACTURERSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  2. Central Washington Refrigeration, Inc. v. BarbeeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Jacob's Meadow Owners Ass'n v. PLATEAU 44Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. Jacob's Meadow Owners Ass'n v. Plateau 44 II, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. Snohomish County Public Transportation Benefit Area Corp. v. Firstgroup America, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2012

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API