Maryland v. Wirtz
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan
As originally enacted,1 the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 required every employer to pay each of his employees “engaged in commerce or in the production *186of goods for commerce” 2 a certain minimum hourly wage, and to pay at a higher rate for work in excess of a certain maximum number of hours per week. The Act defined the term “employer” so as to exclude “the United States or any State or political subdivision of a State . ...”3 This case involves the constitutionality of two sets of amendments to the original enactment.
In 1961, Congress changed the basis of employee coverage: instead of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Parden v. Terminal Railway of Alabama State Docks DepartmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by520 opinions
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- New York v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
515 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.