Legal Opinion

Borchers Bros. v. Buckeye Incubator Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1963No. S. F. No. 20819PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

Plaintiff brought suit to foreclose its claim of lien for materials furnished to defendants Pierce Manufacturing Co. and Thomas Pierce, for use on real property owned by defendant Buckeye Incubator Company.

The complaint failed to allege that plaintiff had given the prelien notice' required by section 1193 of the Code of Civil Procedure!

Defendant Buckeye Incubator Company demurred generally to the complaint. Upon the sustaining of the demurrer, plaintiff failed to amend within the 10 days allowed by the court.

An order dismissing the complaint as to Buckeye Incubator Company was then entered by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Spinney v. GriffithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Alta Building Material Co. v. CameronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Barr Lumber Co. v. ShafferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Miltimore v. Nofziger Bros. Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Diamond Match Co. v. Sanitary Fruit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Connolly Development, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. R. D. Reeder Lathing Co. v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Truestone, Inc. v. Simi West Industrial Park IICalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. People v. Vega-HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Borello v. Eichler Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API