Legal Opinion

City of Cincinnati v. De Golyer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1971No. 69-253PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Neill, C. J.

Section 12 of the Cincinnati income tax ordinance provides that one who fails, neglects or refuses to pay the tax is guilty of a misdemeanor and may be fined or imprisoned therefor.

The sole question presented by this appeal is whether a provision in an income tax ordinance providing for imprisonment for failure to pay the tax violates Section 15 of Article I of the Constitution of Ohio prohibiting imprisonment for debt.

Section 15 of Article I of the Constitution of Ohio provides as follows:

“No person shall be imprisoned for debt in any civil action, on mesne or final process, unless in cases…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strattman v. StudtOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State Ex Rel. Hostetter v. HuntOhio Supreme Court · 1937
  3. State v. RossOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  4. People v. Neal C. Oester, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Voelkel v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Buchman v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. FieldsOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Buchman v. Wayne Trace Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. AllisonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Calhoun v. Supreme CourtOhio Court of Appeals · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API