Legal Opinion
People v. Neal C. Oester, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 22, 1957No. Crim. A. 34PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
A criminal complaint was filed in the Anaheim-Fullerton Municipal Court charging the defendants, as an employing unit, with violation of section 2110 of the California Unemployment Insurance Code in that these defendants did “knowingly withhold the deductions required . . . and did wilfully and unlawfully fail and were financially unable to pay such deductions to the Department of Employment. . . .”
The California Unemployment Insurance Code, after making provision for the withholding by the employer of workers’ contributions to the Unemployment Insurance Fund, holding the same in trust, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re TrombleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Empire Star Mines Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- In Re NowakCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- People v. HolderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- In Re OswaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Moss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Central Delta Water Agency v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- City of Cincinnati v. De GolyerOhio Supreme Court · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.