Legal Opinion
Brown v. Muetzel
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 11, 1984No. C1-84-792PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
This is an appeal from an order appointing a receiver to manage a farm pending the outcome of litigation regarding its purchase. Appellants contend the trial court erred in appointing a receiver because respondents failed to prove the necessary conditions by clear and convincing evidence. We remand.
FACTS
Wayne Brown is an accountant from Woodstock, Illinois. He and two others purchased a farm in Owatonna, Minnesota, by contract for deed from the Muetzels in August 1982. The price was $1,370,000, payable in installments over ten years. They also agreed to pay $56,500 in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Lawrence Zirinsky v. James L. Sheehan, John D. Sheehan and Brooklyn Center Industrial Park, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Beatty v. Winona Housing & Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Straus v. StrausSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rock v. Hennepin Broadcasting Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Minnesota Hotel Co. v. Rosa Development Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Southcross Commerce Center, LLP v. Tupy Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009