Legal Opinion

Svendsen v. Questor Corp.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 15, 1981No. 65155PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALLBEE, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from trial court’s ruling quashing service of process on defendants for want of personal jurisdiction. In sustaining defendants’ special appearance, trial court concluded that “to permit the plaintiff to continue this suit against these defendants would be in violation of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.” We determine, however, that the ruling must be reversed.

On January 1, 1978, plaintiff Cheryl Kay Svendsen was allegedly injured when a pool table collapsed and fell on her foot. The mishap occurred at a bowling alley in Harlan, Iowa.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Gray v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Andersen v. National Presto Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Amended May 4, 2015 Dylan Book and Karen Book v. Voma Tire Corporation, Hunter Engineering Company, Iowa Tire, Inc., Holt Sales and Service, Inc., SICE, S.p.A. and SICE Automotive Equipment Societa Italiana Costruzioni Elettromeccaniche S.I.C.E.-S.p.A.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  2. Rostad v. On-Deck, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. State Ex Rel. Miller v. Internal Energy Management Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  4. Bush v. BASF Wyandotte Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Stanek v. A.P.I., Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API