Bush v. BASF Wyandotte Corp.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
I
The issue involved here is whether, by placing their product into the stream of American commerce so that it reaches consumers in North Carolina by means of the commercial distribution activity of others, CTC and Coronaverken have sufficient contact with North Carolina so that exercise of jurisdiction is lawful when a North Carolina resident is injured by defects in that product. We hold that the North Carolina courts may lawfully assert jurisdiction over the Swedish manufacturers, CTC and Cor-onaverken.
The question of personal jurisdiction over a foreign corporation must be…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Charles Gendler & Co. v. Telecom Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- A. UBERTI & C. v. Leonardo in & for PIMAArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Bruggeman v. Meditrust Acquisition Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Data General Corp. v. County of DurhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Inspirational Network, Inc. v. CombsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.