Legal Opinion

Amended May 4, 2015 Dylan Book and Karen Book v. Voma Tire Corporation, Hunter Engineering Company, Iowa Tire, Inc., Holt Sales and Service, Inc., SICE, S.p.A. and SICE Automotive Equipment Societa Italiana Costruzioni Elettromeccaniche S.I.C.E.-S.p.A.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 6, 2015No. 13–1793PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATERMAN, Justice.

In this appeal, we must confront unsettled federal precedent to decide whether a Chinese tire manufacturer that sold thousands of tires in Iowa through an American distributor may be compelled to defend a lawsuit here consistent with the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution. The tire exploded as an Iowan was airing it up at his father’s business in Adel, Iowa. The Iowan suffered severe and permanent injuries and, through his mother, filed suit in his home county seeking recovery from the tire manufacturer, alleging the tire’s design was defective and…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Scottize Danyelle BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  2. State of Iowa v. Christopher George StormSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  3. SER Ford Motor Co. v. Hon. Warren R. McGraw, JudgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State of Iowa v. Lloyd AschbrennerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  5. Align Corp. Ltd. v. Allister Mark BoustredSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API