Legal Opinion

Giometti v. Etienne

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 15, 1933No. Docket No. 1223PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREWS, J., pro tem.

On December 12, 1927, the parties to this action entered into a contract whereby defendant was to erect, upon land which plaintiffs would deed to him, buildings, machinery and equipment for the manufacture and sale of ice. Defendant was to sell this plant and equipment as finally completed to the plaintiffs for the purchase price of $65,000, of which $15,000 was to be cash, the balance to be paid from receipts for the sale of ice made in the plant. An accounting and payment was to be made each week. The balance due to defendant was to bear interest at eight per cent. Then…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lamb v. HerndonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Pacific Finance Corp. v. LaumanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burr v. Capital Reserve Corp.California Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Meridian Bowling Lanes, Inc. v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Giometti v. EtienneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API