Alston v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MACK, Associate Judge:
Following a jury trial, appellant was convicted of assault with intent to commit carnal knowledge in violation of D.C.Code § 22-501 (1981). Appellant asserts that testimony of three government witnesses as to statements made by the victim, appellant’s four-year-old step-daughter, were improperly classified as spontaneous utterances and erroneously admitted under that exception to the hearsay rule. 1 We find that the challenged statements do not constitute spontaneous utterances. Since we cannot say that their admission did not substantially sway the judgment of the jury…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Beausoliel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Wheeler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- Wyatt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Price v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Galindo v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Barrera v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- United States v. WoodfolkDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.