Legal Opinion

Alston v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 16, 1983No. 81-1446PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACK, Associate Judge:

Following a jury trial, appellant was convicted of assault with intent to commit carnal knowledge in violation of D.C.Code § 22-501 (1981). Appellant asserts that testimony of three government witnesses as to statements made by the victim, appellant’s four-year-old step-daughter, were improperly classified as spontaneous utterances and erroneously admitted under that exception to the hearsay rule. 1 We find that the challenged statements do not constitute spontaneous utterances. Since we cannot say that their admission did not substantially sway the judgment of the jury…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Beausoliel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  4. Wheeler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  5. Wyatt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Price v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Galindo v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Barrera v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. United States v. WoodfolkDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API