United States v. Woodfolk
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Associate Judge.
During a search of Floyd Woodfolk’s home, police found a 9 mm semiautomatic Luger (“Tech 9”) with a loaded magazine in a white plastic bag near Woodfolk’s bedroom. In test-firing the gun to determine operability, it was discovered that the magazine found in the gun was defective in that it failed to properly feed bullets into the chamber of the gun; however, when a new properly functioning magazine was inserted, the gun readily fired multiple rounds.
The jury found Woodfolk guilty of possession of a prohibited weapon (machine gun) in violation of D.C.Code §…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Comber v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- State v. CarlsonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. Alexander, JoeyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Devonshire v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Lewis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Odemns v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Malloy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.