Legal Opinion

Smith v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 31, 1995No. 92-CF-158PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAGNER, Chief Judge:

Following a jury trial, appellant, Raphael Smith, III, was convicted of one count of armed robbery (D.C.Code §§ 22-2901, -3202 (1989)) and one count of possession of a firearm during a crime of violence (D.C.Code § 22-3204(b) (1989)). These charges arose in connection with the robbery of Jorge Frederick (the complainant) on December 11, 1990. 1 Following the robbery, Frederick placed a 911 call to the police, which the police recorded. Prior to trial, the government filed a motion in limine seeking the admission of the taped 911 call. The trial court granted the motion…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Hunter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Randolph v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Lewis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Odemns v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Reyes v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Anderson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API