Legal Opinion
Nathanson v. Murphy
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 9, 1957No. Civ. 17053PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
On March 3, 1953, the trial court granted plaintiff a judgment for $5,000 against defendants in a fraud action, together with interest at 7 per cent from June 11, 1947, the date the court found plaintiff had parted with the money as a result of the alleged fraud. On September 30, 1955, the trial court entered its order granting defendants’ motion to modify nunc pro tunc as of March 27, 1953, the findings of fact, conclusions and judgment in that action by providing that interest should run only from March 3, 1953, the date of the judgment. Plaintiff appeals.
The basic facts are not…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Tally v. GanahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Cowdery v. London Etc. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Bastajian v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Stevens v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Estate of GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Bullis v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Redke v. SilvertrustCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Pepitone v. RussoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Vogelsang v. WolpertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Rabinowitch v. Cal. Western Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.