Betz v. Trainer Wortham & Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Order; Dissent to Order by Chief Judge KOZINSKI; Opinion by Judge GOULD.
ORDER
The opinion filed on October 4, 2007, 504 F.3d 1017, is amended as follows.
The last sentence of the second paragraph in Part I, which reads:
Betz told Como and Castro that she knew nothing about stocks and bonds and that she only would understand the “bottom line,” or total balance, of her account.
shall be deleted in its entirety.
In addition, the second and third sentences of footnote 4, which currently read:
In Davis v. Birr, Wilson & Co., 839 F.2d 1369 (9th Cir.1988), for example, we concluded that summary judgment…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Antonio Abrego Abrego v. The Dow Chemical Co Shell Oil Company, D/B/A Shell Chemical Company, and Shell Agricultural Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP v. Countrywide Financial Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- In Re Countrywide Financial Corporation Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
- In re Charles Schwab Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
- Betz v. Trainer Wortham & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Rieckborn v. Jefferies LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.