Betz v. Trainer Wortham & Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GOULD, Circuit Judge:
On this appeal we previously held that there is a genuine issue of material fact whether Heide Betz’s securities fraud claim against Trainer Wortham & Company, Inc., David P. Como, First Republic Bank, and Robert Vile (collectively Appellees) is time-barred under 28 U.S.C. § 1658(b). Betz v. Trainer Wortham & Co., 519 F.3d 863, 871-72(9th Cir.2008), vacated, — U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 2400, 176 L.Ed.2d 920 (2010). Appellees sought review of our decision through a petition for a writ of certiorari filed in the United States Supreme Court. After deciding the related case of Merck &…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Merck & Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Betz v. Trainer Wortham & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Trainer Wortham & Co. v. BetzSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
3Cited by16 opinions
- Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP v. Countrywide Financial Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Strategic Diversity, Inc. v. Alchemix CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Edward Peruta v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Levier v. Department of Workforce Services, Workforce Appeals BoardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- York County v. Hp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.