Legal Opinion

Beyl v. Swanson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 18, 1925No. 24,871PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Action to foreclose a real estate mortgage given by Arthur Swanson to the Hawick State Bank to secure the payment of a promissory note of $800, which mortgage and note were assigned ijo August Beyl, with a guaranty of payment indorsed on the note. Findings were made holding the bank on the guaranty, and directing a foreclosure. The bank appeals from the order denying its motion in the alternative for amended findings or a new trial.

The evidence disclosed that August Beyl, a man of upwards of 84 years, residing in Wisconsin, had had 10 or 12 transactions with this hank, purchasing promissory…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Martin v. WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Auten v. United States Nat. Bank of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Bank of Genesee v. . Patchin BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  4. Davenport v. StoneMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Houghton v. First National BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank v. Crookston State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Solway State Bank v. School District No. 26Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Federal Land Bank v. Crookston Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Schlozer v. HeckerothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  5. Freedman v. Madison & Kedzie State BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API