Legal Opinion
Davenport v. Stone
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 2, 1895PublishedCited by 24 opinions
Error to Ingbam. (Person, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant Stone brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
This suit is brought against Stone, as the receiver of the bank, upon the following note:
“$1,500. Lansing, Mich., Mar. 1, ’93.
“Ninety days after date, I promise to pay to the order of Orlando F. Barnes fifteen hundred dollars, at the Central Michigan Savings Bank. Value received. Interest at 8 per cent, after maturity.
“John J. Bush."
Indorsed on the back: “Orlando F. Barnes," and “Payment guaranteed. Central Mich. Savings Bank, by Nelson Bradley, Cashier."
The plea was the general issue, with notice that, if the-cashier undertook to guarantee the payment of the note in the name of the bank,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Merchants' Bank v. State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- People's Bank v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Western National Bank v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Monument National Bank v. Globe WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- City Bank of New Haven v. . PerkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Burrowes v. NimocksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
- Citizens Bank v. Bank of WaddyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
- Ellis v. Citizens' National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
- Schofield v. State Nat. Bank of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
- Soo Line Railroad v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.