Legal Opinion
Brown v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 5, 1924No. Civ. No. 4576PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.
Prohibition. A judgment in a justice’s court was entered in the docket on March 9, 1923, as follows:
“March 9, 1923.
“After due and careful deliberation upon the evidence adduced in the above entitled action, the court finds for the defendants, and denies plaintiff his claim.
“It is therefore ordered and adjudged that plaintiff take nothing from said defendants, and that said defendants recover their costs herein expended. ’ ’
On the same day, to wit, March 9, 1923, plaintiff’s attorney was served with a notice that judgment had been rendered against plaintiff, which, omitting the title of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Coker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Acock v. HalseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- McCracken v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Niles v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Naylor v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Overton v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Hammond Lumber Co. v. BloodgoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Simmons v. SimmonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Brainard v. BrainardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Cunial v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.