Legal Opinion

Klaus v. Fleming

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 11, 1956No. 36946Published

1Opinion of the Court

304 P.2d 990 (1956)

F.L. KLAUS et al., Plaintiffs in Error,

v.

Frank N. FLEMING, Defendant in Error.

No. 36946.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

December 11, 1956.

Jack B. Sellers, Drumright, for plaintiff in error F.L. Klaus.

Young, Young & Young, by Glenn A. Young, Sapulpa, for defendant in error.

2Per curiam

This action was commenced by Frank N. Fleming against F.L. Klaus and John Chronister, d/b/a Klaus Radio and Television, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff as the alleged result of the defendant's failure to furnish him proper equipment with which to perform his job. During trial…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mason v. McNealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Chancellor v. ChancellorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  3. Klaus v. FlemingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. Logan v. LoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  5. Anthony v. ColvinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API