Legal Opinion
Town of Nottingham v. Newman
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided November 1, 2001No. 99-677PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.
The defendants, Rick and Diane Newman, appeal an order of the Superior Court (McHugh, J.) awarding $14,650 in civil penalties and $6,000 in attorney’s fees to the plaintiff, the Town of Nottingham (Town). We affirm.
The relevant facts follow. In 1992, the defendants owned two mobile homes located on their 5.7-acre parcel in Nottingham. At that time, the defendants lived in one mobile home. The other mobile home, which was connected to the defendants’ mobile home under a single roof, was occupied by Mrs. Newman’s elderly parents. According to the Town’s zoning ordinance, when more than one…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Vogel v. VogelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- State v. DellorfanoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- Estate of Cargill v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Quirk v. Town of New BostonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- City of Claremont v. TruellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors Ex Rel. Bankruptcy Estate of Felt Manufacturing Co. v. Foss (In Re Felt Manufacturing Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 2007
- Grenier v. Barclay Square Commercial Condominium Owners' Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- Boynton v. FigueroaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- State v. City of DoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- City of Rochester v. CorpeningSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.