Legal Opinion
City of Rochester v. Corpening
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided May 26, 2006No. 2005-389PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGalway, J.
The petitioner, City of Rochester (city), appeals an order of the Superior Court (Fauver, J.) denying its request for civil penalties pursuant to RSA 676:17, 1(b) (1996) (amended 2005), and granting respondent George Blaisdell’s motion to reconsider the court’s remedy regarding certain motor vehicle junkyard violations. We affirm.
The record supports the following facts. Respondent James Corpening owns two adjoining properties located at 788 and 794 Portland Street in Rochester. Blaisdell resides at 794 Portland Street and Corpening contends that Blaisdell is supposed to maintain both…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Carignan v. New Hampshire International Speedway, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- North Country Environmental Services, Inc. v. Town of BethlehemSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- Town of Nottingham v. HarveySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Harrington v. Town of WarnerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Franklin v. Town of NewportSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ouellette v. Town of KingstonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- Bennett v. Town of HampsteadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- Appeal of Coos County Commissioners o/b/o the Unincorporated Places of Dixville, NH and Millsfield, NHSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
- Greenland Conservation Commission v. New Hampshire Wetlands CouncilSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- State v. DoyleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.