Legal Opinion

Zietko v. New Jersey Manufacturers Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 6, 1944PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Perskie, J.

Briefly stated, the dispositive question in this cause is one of jurisdiction of the subject-matter. More specifically stated, the question for decision, is whether the Supreme Court, as is urged, or the Workmen’s Compensation Bureau, as was held, had “exclusive original jurisdiction” (R. S. 34:15-49) to entertain and determine appellant’s pleaded cause, instituted in the Supreme Court and based upon an asserted agreement allegedly made with respondent pursuant to R. S. 34:15 — 50.

The material facts which give rise to the posed question are…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sexton ex rel. Kin v. Newark District Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
  2. Holzapfel v. Hoboken Manufacturers' RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1918

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Donofrio v. Haag Brothers, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  2. DeFlesco v. Mercer County Board of ElectionsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  3. Hajnas v. Engelhard Min. & Chem. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  4. Belfer v. BorrellaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API