Legal Opinion
D., L. & WR CO. v. City of Hoboken
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 10, 1951PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
16 N.J. Super. 543 (1951)
85 A.2d 200
DELAWARE, LACKAWANNA & WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT AND RESPONDENT,
v.
CITY OF HOBOKEN, AND OTHERS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 17, 1951.
Decided December 10, 1951.
Before Judges JACOBS, EASTWOOD and BIGELOW.
Mr. Raymond J. Lamb argued the cause for the appellant and respondent, D.L. & W. Railroad Company (Messrs. Markley & Broadhurst, attorneys; Messrs. Edward A. Markley and Donald R. Creighton, of counsel).
Mr. Milton B. Conford argued the cause for respondents…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Township of Hillsborough v. CromwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Greene v. Louisville & Interurban RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Giordano v. City Commission of the City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Samuel Hird & Sons, Inc. v. City of GarfieldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- State v. OakleyTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- City of Passaic v. Gera MillsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- Public Service Electric & Gas Co. v. Township of WoodbridgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Central RR Co. v. NeeldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.