Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Tellabs, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 19, 2004No. 02 C 4356PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ST. EVE, District Judge.
Defendants have moved to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. Their motion is granted.
This putative class action lawsuit is brought by various plaintiffs individually and on behalf of persons who purchased common stock of Defendant Tellabs between December 11, 2000 and June 19, 2001 (the “Class Period”). Plaintiffs 1 brought this purported class action alleging that Defendants engaged in a scheme to deceive and defraud investors as to the true value of…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,228 Rocco Dileo and Louise Dileo v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- General Electric Capital Corporation v. Lease Resolution CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Emil J. Bartholet v. Reishauer A.G. (Zurich) and Reishauer Corporation (Elgin)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Novak v. KasaksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Steckman v. Hart Brewing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- In Re Spiegel, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
- In Re Cree, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
- City of Austin Police Retirement System v. ITT Educational Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2005
- Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. v. Tellabs, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.