Legal Opinion

Canales v. Stuyvesant Insurance

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided March 26, 1958PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Starke, J.

This is an action for damages, in the limits of a policy, against Stuyvesant Insurance Company for breach of contract, and Northeast Discount Corporation for inducing the breach.

In July, 1953 plaintiff purchased an automobile for $1,400 from a dealer under a conditional sales contract, which was immediately assigned to the defendant Northeast. Northeast caused the issuance of a fire and theft policy by the American Fidelity Company for a term of 18 months, naming plaintiff and Northeast as coinsureds. In September, 1954 American Fidelity cancelled this policy for resasons not now pertinent,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hornstein v. PodwitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Lamb v. S. Cheney & SonNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Campbell v. . GatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Cross v. National Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Interstate Ice & Power Corp. v. United States Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. International Minerals & Resources, Inc. v. PappasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  2. Mutual Creamery Insurance v. Iowa National Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1969
  3. Dupont Galleries, Inc. v. International Magne-Tape, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  4. Jefferson Credit Corp. v. United States Liability InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API