Legal Opinion

Hawes v. Macy's Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided September 28, 2018No. Case No. 1:17-cv-754PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Timothy S. Black, United States District Judge

This civil action is before the Court upon Defendant Macy's Inc. ("Macy's")'s motion to dismiss for lack of standing and failure to state a claim (Doc. 17) and the parties' responsive memoranda (Docs. 25 and 34).

I. FACTS AS ALLEGED BY THE PLAINTIFF

For purposes of this motion to dismiss, the Court must: (1) view the complaint in the light most favorable to Plaintiffs; and (2) take all well-pleaded factual allegations as true. Tackett v. M & G Polymers , 561 F.3d 478, 488 (6th Cir. 2009).

Plaintiffs Sara Hawes and Amy Hill are unsatisfied customers…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Tackett v. M & G POLYMERS, USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  5. Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bechtel v. Fitness Equipment Services, LLC dba Sole FitnessDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
  2. Bruno v. American Textile Company, IncorporatedDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
  3. MORRISON v. AQ TEXTILES LLCDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2022
  4. Riley v. General Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API