In Re the Reinstatement of DeBacker
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtKauger, J.
¶ 1 A former member of the Oklahoma Bar Association seeks reinstatement pursuant to Rule 11, Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, 5 0.8. Supp.2002, Ch. 1, App. I-A.1 *508The Bar Association and the trial panel recommended reinstatement.2 Upon a de novo review, we hold that the petitioner was engaged in the unauthorized practice of law for twenty-seven years and his conduct encompassed misrepresentation. The petitioner remains suspended until April 10, 2008, and the petitioner is ordered to pay costs of $1,558.49 as well as his past bar dues, which total $4,425.00. Payment of $5,978.49 is due…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Tweedy v. Oklahoma Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- In Re Integration of State Bar of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DorisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. KinseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- In Re the Reinstatement of MunsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- Masquat v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. CombsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- In Re Reinstatement of PacenzaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.