Legal Opinion
APOLLO SPRINKLER COMPANY v. Fire Sprinkler Suppliers & Design, Inc.
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 20, 1986No. Civ. 10971PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Justice.
Apollo Sprinkler Co., Inc. (Apollo), appealed from a district court judgment in a garnishment proceeding in which Apollo asserted the right of Fire Sprinkler Suppliers & Design, Inc. (Fire Sprinkler), to benefits under an insurance policy issued by Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. (MSI). Apollo also appealed from an order denying its motions for amendment of the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and judgment. The dispositive issue on appeal is whether or not the trial court properly applied Minnesota, rather than North Dakota, law in construing the insurance…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Auten v. AutenNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Swift & Co. v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Applegren v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Bor-Son Building Corp. v. Employers Commercial Union Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nodak Mutual Insurance Co. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Daley v. American States Preferred Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Nodak Mutual Insurance Co. v. WamsleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Vigen Construction Co. v. Millers National Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Plante v. Columbia PaintsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.