Legal Opinion

United States v. Milton J. Largent, United States of America v. Jonathon B. Higdon

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 13, 1976No. 76-1285, 76-1286PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEICK, Circuit Judge.

Appellants Largent and Higdon were convicted by a jury in the District Court on two counts of a six-count indictment charging them with the substantive offenses of aiding, abetting, inducing, and causing the use of extortionate means to collect an extension of credit in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 891, 894 and 2. Largent was acquitted on three counts of the indictment charging the commission of other substantive offenses. Both Largent and Higdon were acquitted on the count charging conspiracy to commit the substantive offenses.

Largent received concurrent sentences of four…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Perez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Dillingham v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert ZelinkaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. John Charles BlankenshipCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. Shannon N. Mahar (85-1411), Inner-City Medical Services, Inc. (85-1413), Riley Mahar (85-1466)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Mohammed IsmailCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. Derrell Darnell HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API