Legal Opinion

United States v. Mohammed Ismail

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 18, 1985No. 84-1489PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONTIE, Circuit Judge.

Mohammed Ismail, a Pakistani national, appeals from a judgment entered after a jury convicted him of conspiring to import and distribute heroin (Count I), of importing heroin (Count II) and of using a communication facility to facilitate the importation and distribution of heroin (Count III). Ismail contends that the district court should not have permitted his son to testify against him because of an asserted parent-child privilege, that the court should not have admitted testimony about two collateral criminal acts under Federal Rule of Evidence (FRE) 404(b) and that…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Train v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Wolfle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. United States v. Roy C. Blakeney (90-5664), Kenneth A. Kutnyak (90-5665), and James E. Box (90-6041)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. Kevin Eugene WrightCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Juan A. Acosta-CazaresCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Felino RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. David Shew FeinmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API