Legal Opinion

United States v. Robert Zelinka

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 25, 1988No. 87-3725PublishedCited by 124 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIVELY, Circuit Judge.

This appeal from a jury conviction for conspiracy to distribute cocaine and unlawful use of communication facilities raises several claims of reversible error in the district court proceedings. The two most serious challenges involve an unauthorized contact with jurors and the admission of evidence that the defendant contends should have been excluded under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b). Zelinka does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence, and we will discuss the claimed errors in turn after briefly stating the facts.

I

On December 16, 1986, a grand jury in the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by124 opinions

  1. State v. PhillipsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. United States v. WaltonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  4. State v. HerringOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. United States v. FrostCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997

119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API