Carolina M Lopez, et al. v. Bell Bank, et al.
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Carolina M Lopez, et al., No. CV-25-02808-PHX-SHD 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 Bell Bank, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 At issue is a discovery dispute regarding the location and manner of Plaintiff Charles 16 Kirkland’s deposition. Defendants (collectively, “Bell Bank”) also move to compel the in- 17 person appearance of Kirkland for trial. (Doc. 34.) Both issues are fully briefed. (Docs. 18 34, 38, 41.) For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs’ request for a remote deposition and 19 Bell Bank’s motion to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mill-Run Tours, Inc. v. KhashoggiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Jahr v. IU International Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1986
- Cressler v. NeuenschwanderDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- Fausto v. Credigy Services Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2008
- Brown v. CarrDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.